training: be referred as cyclical process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents preparation
Weight: 0.68
, equipment
Weight: 0.64
, field
Weight: 0.62
, step
Weight: 0.61
, exercise
Weight: 0.61
Siblings learning
Weight: 0.58
, air conditioning
Weight: 0.34
, first aid kit
Weight: 0.33
, fitness
Weight: 0.33
, football field
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be referred as cyclical process 1.00
be referred as process 0.84
be viewed as commodity 0.75
affect cycle 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(training, be referred as cyclical process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be viewed as commodity)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(training, be referred as cyclical process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(fitness, be viewed as commodity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(fitness, be viewed as commodity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(training, be referred as cyclical process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(training, be referred as cyclical process)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(training, be referred as cyclical process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(training, be referred as process)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(training, be referred as cyclical process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(training, be referred as process)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(training, be referred as cyclical process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(training, be referred as process)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(training, be referred as cyclical process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(training, be referred as process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(training, be referred as cyclical process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(training, be referred as cyclical process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(training, be referred as cyclical process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(training, be referred as cyclical process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(training, be referred as cyclical process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(training, be referred as cyclical process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fitness, be viewed as commodity)