tram: exist in kolkata

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents public transport
Weight: 0.57
, road
Weight: 0.54
, vehicle
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.52
Siblings trolley
Weight: 0.34
, school bus
Weight: 0.33
, bus stop
Weight: 0.33
, bus
Weight: 0.33
, station wagon
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
exist in kolkata 1.00
run in kolkata 0.94
exist 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(thing, exist)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(tram, exist in kolkata)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(tram, exist in kolkata)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(thing, exist)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(tram, exist in kolkata)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(thing, exist)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(thing, exist)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(tram, exist in kolkata)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(tram, exist in kolkata)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(tram, exist in kolkata)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(tram, exist in kolkata)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(tram, exist in kolkata)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(tram, run in kolkata)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(tram, exist in kolkata)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(tram, run in kolkata)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(tram, exist in kolkata)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(tram, run in kolkata)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(tram, exist in kolkata)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(tram, exist)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(tram, exist in kolkata)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(tram, run in kolkata)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(tram, exist in kolkata)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(tram, exist)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(tram, exist in kolkata)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(tram, exist)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(tram, exist in kolkata)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tram, exist)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(tram, exist in kolkata)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(tram, exist in kolkata)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(tram, exist in kolkata)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(tram, exist in kolkata)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(tram, exist in kolkata)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(tram, exist in kolkata)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(thing, exist)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(tram, exist in kolkata)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(thing, exist)