transcription: was useful producing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.62
, function
Weight: 0.59
, system
Weight: 0.57
, information
Weight: 0.56
Siblings rna polymerase
Weight: 0.62
, translation
Weight: 0.33
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, cellular respiration
Weight: 0.33
, coding
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was useful producing 1.00
be produced 0.80
be important making 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(transcription, was useful producing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(transcription, was useful producing)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(transcription, was useful producing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(transcription, be produced)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(transcription, was useful producing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(transcription, be produced)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(transcription, was useful producing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(transcription, be produced)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(transcription, was useful producing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(transcription, be important making)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(transcription, was useful producing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(transcription, be important making)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(transcription, was useful producing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(transcription, be produced)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(transcription, was useful producing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(transcription, be important making)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(transcription, was useful producing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(transcription, be important making)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(transcription, was useful producing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(transcription, was useful producing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(transcription, was useful producing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(transcription, was useful producing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(transcription, was useful producing)