transistor: be better than valves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.65
, semiconductor
Weight: 0.64
, electrode
Weight: 0.60
, device
Weight: 0.59
Siblings capacitor
Weight: 0.62
, fet
Weight: 0.42
, silicon
Weight: 0.38
, silicon carbide
Weight: 0.37
, diode
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than valves 1.00
be similar to valves 0.95
be called valve 0.87
be better than vacuum tubes 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(transistor, be better than valves)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(diode, be similar to valves)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(transistor, be better than valves)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(diode, be called valve)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(transistor, be better than valves)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(diode, be similar to valves)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(diode, be similar to valves)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(transistor, be better than valves)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(diode, be called valve)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(diode, be called valve)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(transistor, be better than valves)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(transistor, be better than valves)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(transistor, be better than valves)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(transistor, be better than vacuum tubes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(transistor, be better than valves)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(transistor, be better than vacuum tubes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(transistor, be better than valves)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(transistor, be better than vacuum tubes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(transistor, be better than valves)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(transistor, be better than vacuum tubes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(transistor, be better than valves)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(transistor, be better than valves)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(transistor, be better than valves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(transistor, be better than valves)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(transistor, be better than valves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(transistor, be better than valves)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(diode, be called valve)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(transistor, be better than valves)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(diode, be similar to valves)