transition: be important writing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents move
Weight: 0.63
, step
Weight: 0.61
, opportunity
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.57
, time
Weight: 0.57
Siblings next
Weight: 0.56
, change
Weight: 0.33
, process
Weight: 0.32
, consolidation
Weight: 0.32
, development
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important writing 1.00
be important writing brainly 1.00
be important in writing 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(transition, be important writing)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(process, be important in writing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(transition, be important writing)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(process, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(process, be important in writing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(transition, be important writing)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(transition, be important writing)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(transition, be important writing)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(transition, be important writing brainly)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(transition, be important writing)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(transition, be important in writing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(transition, be important writing)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(transition, be important writing brainly)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(transition, be important writing)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(transition, be important in writing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(transition, be important writing)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(transition, be important in writing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(transition, be important writing)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(transition, be important in writing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(transition, be important writing)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(transition, be important writing brainly)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(transition, be important writing)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(transition, be important writing brainly)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(transition, be important writing)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(transition, be important writing)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(transition, be important writing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(transition, be important writing)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(transition, be important writing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(transition, be important writing)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(process, be important in writing)