translocation: be described as active process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mechanism
Weight: 0.62
, abnormality
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.52
, mutation
Weight: 0.45
, research
Weight: 0.45
Siblings apoptosis
Weight: 0.34
, atrial fibrillation
Weight: 0.33
, adrenal gland
Weight: 0.32
, polymorphism
Weight: 0.32
, tumor
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be described as active process 1.00
be described as process 0.93
is active process 0.90
be referred as process 0.87
is active 0.83
be important in process 0.83
be referred as systematic process 0.82
has physical part process 0.82
be integral part of process 0.80
be known as system 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(translocation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(adrenal gland, be known as system)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(translocation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(adrenal gland, be known as system)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(adrenal gland, be known as system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(translocation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(translocation, be described as active process)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(translocation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(translocation, be described as process)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(translocation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(translocation, is active process)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(translocation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(translocation, be described as process)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(translocation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(translocation, is active process)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(translocation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(translocation, is active process)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(translocation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(translocation, is active)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(translocation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(translocation, be described as process)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(translocation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(translocation, has physical part process)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(translocation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(translocation, be described as process)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(translocation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(translocation, has physical part process)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(translocation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(translocation, is active)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(translocation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(translocation, is active)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(translocation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(translocation, has physical part process)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(translocation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(translocation, has physical part process)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(translocation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(translocation, is active process)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(translocation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(translocation, is active)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(translocation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(translocation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(translocation, be described as active process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(translocation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(translocation, be described as active process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(translocation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(adrenal gland, be known as system)