transparency: be within organization

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents principle
Weight: 0.68
, value
Weight: 0.63
, issue
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, tool
Weight: 0.59
Siblings fairness
Weight: 0.37
, openness
Weight: 0.37
, honesty
Weight: 0.36
, integrity
Weight: 0.35
, freedom
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be within organization 1.00
be within organization important 0.98
be important in organization 0.89
be important for organizations 0.80
be determined within scope 0.75
be determined within scope of amnog 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(value, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(transparency, be within organization)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(value, be important for organizations)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(transparency, be within organization)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(transparency, be within organization)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(value, be important in organization)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(transparency, be within organization)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(value, be important for organizations)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(transparency, be within organization)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(value, be important in organization)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(transparency, be within organization)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(value, be important for organizations)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(value, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(transparency, be within organization)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(transparency, be within organization)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(value, be important for organizations)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(transparency, be within organization)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(transparency, be within organization)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(transparency, be within organization)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(transparency, be within organization)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(transparency, be within organization)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(transparency, be within organization important)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(transparency, be within organization)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(transparency, be important in organization)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(transparency, be within organization)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(transparency, be within organization important)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(transparency, be within organization)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(transparency, be within organization important)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(transparency, be within organization)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(transparency, be within organization important)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(transparency, be within organization)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(transparency, be important in organization)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(transparency, be within organization)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(transparency, be important in organization)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(transparency, be within organization)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(transparency, be important in organization)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(transparency, be within organization)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(transparency, be within organization)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(transparency, be within organization)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(transparency, be within organization)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(transparency, be within organization)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(transparency, be within organization)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(value, be important in organization)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(transparency, be within organization)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(value, be important for organizations)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(transparency, be within organization)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(value, be important in organization)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(transparency, be within organization)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(value, be important for organizations)