transplant: fail because of rejection

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents treatment
Weight: 0.65
, organ
Weight: 0.64
, patient
Weight: 0.64
, surgery
Weight: 0.55
Siblings kidney
Weight: 0.36
, dialysis
Weight: 0.36
, reproductive organ
Weight: 0.36
, blood transfusion
Weight: 0.35
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
fail because of rejection 1.00
fail 0.83
get rejected 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(surgery, fail)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(transplant, fail because of rejection)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(transplant, fail because of rejection)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(surgery, fail)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(transplant, fail because of rejection)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(surgery, fail)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(transplant, fail because of rejection)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(kidney, fail)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(transplant, fail because of rejection)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, fail)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(surgery, fail)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(transplant, fail because of rejection)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(transplant, fail because of rejection)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(transplant, fail because of rejection)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(kidney, fail)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(kidney, fail)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(transplant, fail because of rejection)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(dialysis, fail)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(dialysis, fail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(transplant, fail because of rejection)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(transplant, fail because of rejection)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(transplant, fail because of rejection)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(transplant, fail)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(transplant, fail because of rejection)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(transplant, fail)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(transplant, fail because of rejection)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(transplant, fail)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(transplant, fail because of rejection)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(transplant, fail)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(transplant, fail because of rejection)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(transplant, get rejected)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(transplant, fail because of rejection)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(transplant, get rejected)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(transplant, fail because of rejection)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(transplant, get rejected)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(transplant, fail because of rejection)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(transplant, get rejected)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(transplant, fail because of rejection)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(transplant, fail because of rejection)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(transplant, fail because of rejection)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(transplant, fail because of rejection)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(transplant, fail because of rejection)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(transplant, fail because of rejection)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(surgery, fail)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(transplant, fail because of rejection)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(kidney, fail)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(transplant, fail because of rejection)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(dialysis, fail)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(transplant, fail because of rejection)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(surgery, fail)