transportation: be bad in us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents necessity
Weight: 0.64
, resource
Weight: 0.63
, area
Weight: 0.63
, system
Weight: 0.62
Siblings bus station
Weight: 0.66
, train
Weight: 0.62
, plane ticket
Weight: 0.60
, bullet train
Weight: 0.49
, seaport
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad in us 1.00
be bad for earth 0.81
has quality bad 0.80
be bad for environment 0.80
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(system, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(transportation, be bad in us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(transportation, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(system, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(transportation, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(system, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(system, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(transportation, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(transportation, be bad in us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(transportation, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(transportation, be bad in us)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(transportation, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(transportation, be bad for earth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(transportation, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(transportation, be bad for earth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(transportation, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(transportation, be bad for earth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(transportation, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(transportation, be bad for earth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(transportation, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(transportation, be bad for environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(transportation, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(transportation, be bad for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(transportation, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(transportation, be bad for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(transportation, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(transportation, be bad for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(transportation, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(transportation, be bad for environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(transportation, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(transportation, be bad for environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(transportation, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(transportation, be bad for environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(transportation, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(transportation, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(transportation, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(transportation, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(transportation, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(transportation, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(transportation, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(transportation, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(transportation, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(transportation, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(transportation, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(transportation, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(transportation, be bad in us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(transportation, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(transportation, be bad in us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(transportation, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(system, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(transportation, be bad in us)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(system, be bad for environment)