trash can: be at park

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.67
, debris
Weight: 0.66
, weapon
Weight: 0.65
, container
Weight: 0.64
, trash
Weight: 0.55
Siblings garbage can
Weight: 0.39
, trash bag
Weight: 0.38
, junk mail
Weight: 0.35
, human waste
Weight: 0.34
, food can
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at park 1.00
be at state park 0.91
be at park lot 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(trash, be at park)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(trash can, be at park)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(trash can, be at park)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(trash can, be at park)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash can, be at park)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(trash, be at park)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash can, be at park)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(trash, be at state park)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash can, be at park)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(trash, be at park lot)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at park)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at park)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at park)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at state park)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at park)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at park lot)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(trash, be at park)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(trash can, be at park)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(trash can, be at park)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(trash can, be at park)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(trash can, be at park)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(trash can, be at park)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(trash can, be at park)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash can, be at park)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(trash can, be at park)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(trash can, be at park)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(trash can, be at state park)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(trash can, be at park)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at state park)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash can, be at park)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(trash can, be at state park)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(trash can, be at park)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(trash can, be at state park)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(trash can, be at park)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(trash can, be at park)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash can, be at park)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(trash can, be at park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at park)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(trash, be at park)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at park)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(trash, be at state park)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at park)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(trash, be at park lot)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(trash can, be at park)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(trash, be at park)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(trash can, be at park)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(trash, be at state park)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(trash can, be at park)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(trash, be at park lot)