trash can: be at restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.67
, debris
Weight: 0.66
, weapon
Weight: 0.65
, container
Weight: 0.64
, trash
Weight: 0.55
Siblings garbage can
Weight: 0.39
, trash bag
Weight: 0.38
, junk mail
Weight: 0.35
, human waste
Weight: 0.34
, food can
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at restaurant 1.00
be at hotel 0.80
be used to store food 0.78
be at store 0.77
be at kitchen 0.76
be at supermarket 0.76
be at grocery store 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(item, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(trash can, be at restaurant)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(container, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(trash can, be at restaurant)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(trash, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(trash can, be at restaurant)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(trash, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(trash can, be at restaurant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(trash, be at hotel)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(trash, be at kitchen)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(container, be at kitchen)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(item, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at hotel)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at kitchen)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(container, be at kitchen)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(item, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(garbage can, be at kitchen)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(food can, be used to store food)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(food can, be at grocery store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(trash, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(trash can, be at restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(item, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(trash can, be at restaurant)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(container, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(trash can, be at restaurant)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(trash, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(trash can, be at restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(food can, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(food can, be at supermarket)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(food can, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(food can, be at grocery store)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(garbage can, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(garbage can, be at kitchen)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(food can, be used to store food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(food can, be used to store food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(trash can, be at restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(trash can, be at hotel)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at hotel)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at kitchen)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(trash can, be at kitchen)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(trash can, be at hotel)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(trash can, be at hotel)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(trash can, be at kitchen)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(trash can, be at kitchen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(trash can, be at restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(trash, be at hotel)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(item, be at store)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(container, be at kitchen)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(trash, be at kitchen)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(food can, be used to store food)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(food can, be at supermarket)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(garbage can, be at kitchen)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(food can, be at grocery store)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(item, be at store)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(container, be at kitchen)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(trash, be at hotel)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(trash can, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(trash, be at kitchen)