trash container: be at area behind restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.57
Siblings garbage
Weight: 0.35
, jar
Weight: 0.33
, suitcase
Weight: 0.32
, crate
Weight: 0.32
, bucket
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at area behind restaurant 1.00
be at restaurant 0.87
be at fast food restaurant 0.82
be near patio 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(trash container, be at area behind restaurant)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(trash container, be at area behind restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(trash container, be at area behind restaurant)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(trash container, be at restaurant)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(trash container, be at area behind restaurant)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(trash container, be at restaurant)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(trash container, be at area behind restaurant)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(trash container, be at fast food restaurant)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(trash container, be at area behind restaurant)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(trash container, be at fast food restaurant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(trash container, be at area behind restaurant)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(trash container, be at restaurant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(trash container, be at area behind restaurant)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(trash container, be at restaurant)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(trash container, be at area behind restaurant)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(trash container, be at fast food restaurant)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(trash container, be at area behind restaurant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(trash container, be near patio)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(trash container, be at area behind restaurant)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(trash container, be at fast food restaurant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(trash container, be at area behind restaurant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(trash container, be near patio)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(trash container, be at area behind restaurant)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(trash container, be near patio)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(trash container, be at area behind restaurant)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(trash container, be near patio)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(trash container, be at area behind restaurant)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(trash container, be at area behind restaurant)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(trash container, be at area behind restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(trash container, be at area behind restaurant)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(trash container, be at area behind restaurant)