trash: be at park lot

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trash can
Weight: 0.75
, container
Weight: 0.60
, service
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.59
, job
Weight: 0.55
Siblings trash bag
Weight: 0.37
, garbage can
Weight: 0.37
, garbage
Weight: 0.36
, litter
Weight: 0.34
, waste
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at park lot 1.00
be at park 0.89
be at state park 0.83
be used to store thing in garage 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash can, be at park)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(trash, be at park lot)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(trash can, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(trash, be at park lot)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(trash can, be used to store thing in garage)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(trash, be at park lot)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(trash can, be at park)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(trash can, be at state park)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(trash can, be used to store thing in garage)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at park)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at state park)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be used to store thing in garage)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(litter, be at park)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash can, be at park)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(trash, be at park lot)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(trash can, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(trash, be at park lot)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(trash can, be used to store thing in garage)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(trash, be at park lot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(litter, be at park)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(litter, be at park)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(trash, be at park lot)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at park)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(trash, be at park)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at state park)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(trash, be at park)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(trash, be at state park)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(trash, be at state park)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(trash, be at park)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(trash, be at state park)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at park lot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(trash, be at park lot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(trash can, be at park)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(trash can, be at state park)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(trash can, be used to store thing in garage)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(litter, be at park)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(trash can, be at park)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(trash can, be at state park)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(trash, be at park lot)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(trash can, be used to store thing in garage)