trash: be problem for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trash can
Weight: 0.75
, container
Weight: 0.60
, service
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.59
, job
Weight: 0.55
Siblings trash bag
Weight: 0.37
, garbage can
Weight: 0.37
, garbage
Weight: 0.36
, garbage man
Weight: 0.35
, recycling
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem for environment 1.00
has state problem 0.85
be such problem in world 0.85
affect environment 0.83
be harmful to environment 0.82
is issue 0.78
is global issue 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(trash, be problem for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(garbage, has state problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(garbage, affect environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(recycling, affect environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(trash, be problem for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(recycling, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(recycling, affect environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(garbage, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(garbage, affect environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(garbage, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(garbage, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(trash, be problem for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(trash, affect environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(trash, affect environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(trash, is issue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(trash, affect environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(trash, has state problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(trash, is issue)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(trash, has state problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(trash, be such problem in world)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(trash, be harmful to environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(trash, is issue)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(trash, be such problem in world)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(trash, be harmful to environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(trash, be harmful to environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(trash, is global issue)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(trash, has state problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(trash, be such problem in world)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(trash, be harmful to environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(trash, is global issue)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(trash, be such problem in world)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(trash, has state problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(trash, affect environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(trash, is issue)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(trash, is global issue)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(trash, is global issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(trash, be problem for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(trash, be problem for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(recycling, affect environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(garbage, affect environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(garbage, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(trash, be problem for environment)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)