travel agent: be cheaper than airlines

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agent
Weight: 0.75
, travel
Weight: 0.71
, specialist
Weight: 0.63
, business
Weight: 0.63
Siblings cruise
Weight: 0.58
, aaa
Weight: 0.52
, travel agency
Weight: 0.39
, biological agent
Weight: 0.39
, air travel
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than airlines 1.00
is cheaper 0.83
is more expensive 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, be cheaper than airlines)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cruise, is more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(travel agent, be cheaper than airlines)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(cruise, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(cruise, is more expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(travel agent, be cheaper than airlines)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(travel agent, be cheaper than airlines)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(travel agent, be cheaper than airlines)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(travel agent, is cheaper)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(travel agent, be cheaper than airlines)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(travel agent, is cheaper)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(travel agent, be cheaper than airlines)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(travel agent, is cheaper)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(travel agent, be cheaper than airlines)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(travel agent, is more expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(travel agent, be cheaper than airlines)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, is cheaper)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(travel agent, be cheaper than airlines)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(travel agent, is more expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(travel agent, be cheaper than airlines)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(travel agent, is more expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(travel agent, be cheaper than airlines)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, is more expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(travel agent, be cheaper than airlines)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(travel agent, be cheaper than airlines)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, be cheaper than airlines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(travel agent, be cheaper than airlines)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(travel agent, be cheaper than airlines)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, be cheaper than airlines)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(cruise, is more expensive)