travel agent: get paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agent
Weight: 0.75
, travel
Weight: 0.71
, specialist
Weight: 0.63
, business
Weight: 0.63
Siblings cruise
Weight: 0.58
, aaa
Weight: 0.52
, travel agency
Weight: 0.39
, biological agent
Weight: 0.39
, air travel
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(travel agent, get paid)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(specialist, get paid)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(travel agent, get paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(travel agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(specialist, get paid)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(travel agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(agent, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(agent, get paid)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(specialist, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(travel agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(travel agent, get paid)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(specialist, get paid)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(travel agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(travel agent, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(travel agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(travel agent, get paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(travel agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(travel agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(travel agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(travel agent, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(specialist, get paid)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(agent, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(travel agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(specialist, get paid)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(travel agent, get paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(agent, get paid)