travel: be in arctic difficult

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents air travel
Weight: 0.74
, operating expense
Weight: 0.65
, adventure
Weight: 0.62
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, traveler
Weight: 0.59
Siblings time travel
Weight: 0.38
, trip
Weight: 0.36
, ticket
Weight: 0.33
, camping
Weight: 0.32
, snow skiing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in arctic difficult 1.00
be in arctic 0.93
is difficult 0.78
was across sahara desert difficult 0.77
was acrossed sahara difficult 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(travel, be in arctic difficult)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(time travel, is difficult)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(travel, be in arctic difficult)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(time travel, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(time travel, is difficult)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(travel, be in arctic difficult)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(travel, be in arctic difficult)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(travel, be in arctic difficult)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(travel, be in arctic)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(travel, be in arctic difficult)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(travel, be in arctic)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(travel, be in arctic difficult)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(travel, be in arctic)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(travel, be in arctic difficult)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(travel, be in arctic)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(travel, be in arctic difficult)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(travel, was across sahara desert difficult)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(travel, be in arctic difficult)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(travel, was across sahara desert difficult)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(travel, be in arctic difficult)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(travel, was across sahara desert difficult)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(travel, be in arctic difficult)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(travel, was across sahara desert difficult)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(travel, be in arctic difficult)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(travel, was acrossed sahara difficult)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(travel, be in arctic difficult)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(travel, was acrossed sahara difficult)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(travel, be in arctic difficult)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(travel, was acrossed sahara difficult)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(travel, be in arctic difficult)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(travel, was acrossed sahara difficult)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(travel, be in arctic difficult)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(travel, be in arctic difficult)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(travel, be in arctic difficult)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(travel, be in arctic difficult)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(travel, be in arctic difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(travel, be in arctic difficult)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(time travel, is difficult)