travel: was across sahara

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents air travel
Weight: 0.74
, operating expense
Weight: 0.65
, adventure
Weight: 0.62
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, traveler
Weight: 0.59
Siblings time travel
Weight: 0.38
, trip
Weight: 0.36
, ticket
Weight: 0.33
, camping
Weight: 0.32
, snow skiing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was across sahara 1.00
was across sahara hard 0.95
was across sahara desert 0.93
was across sahara desert difficult 0.89
was across sahara challenging 0.87
was acrossed sahara difficult 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(travel, was across sahara)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(travel, was across sahara)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(travel, was across sahara)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(travel, was across sahara desert)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(travel, was across sahara)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(travel, was across sahara hard)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(travel, was across sahara)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(travel, was across sahara desert)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(travel, was across sahara)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(travel, was across sahara desert difficult)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(travel, was across sahara)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(travel, was across sahara challenging)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(travel, was across sahara)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(travel, was across sahara desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(travel, was across sahara)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(travel, was across sahara desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(travel, was across sahara)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(travel, was across sahara desert difficult)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(travel, was across sahara)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(travel, was across sahara challenging)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(travel, was across sahara)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(travel, was across sahara challenging)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(travel, was across sahara)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(travel, was across sahara desert difficult)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(travel, was across sahara)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(travel, was acrossed sahara difficult)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(travel, was across sahara)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(travel, was across sahara hard)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(travel, was across sahara)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(travel, was across sahara desert difficult)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(travel, was across sahara)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(travel, was across sahara hard)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(travel, was across sahara)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(travel, was across sahara challenging)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(travel, was across sahara)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(travel, was across sahara hard)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(travel, was across sahara)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(travel, was acrossed sahara difficult)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(travel, was across sahara)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(travel, was acrossed sahara difficult)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(travel, was across sahara)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(travel, was acrossed sahara difficult)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(travel, was across sahara)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(travel, was across sahara)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(travel, was across sahara)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(travel, was across sahara)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(travel, was across sahara)