travel: was across sahara challenging

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents air travel
Weight: 0.74
, operating expense
Weight: 0.65
, adventure
Weight: 0.62
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, traveler
Weight: 0.59
Siblings time travel
Weight: 0.38
, trip
Weight: 0.36
, ticket
Weight: 0.33
, camping
Weight: 0.32
, snow skiing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was across sahara challenging 1.00
was across sahara desert difficult 0.88
was across sahara hard 0.88
was across sahara 0.87
was acrossed sahara difficult 0.85
was across sahara desert 0.82
was difficult in times 0.77
was difficult in ancient times 0.75
is difficult 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(time travel, is difficult)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(time travel, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(time travel, is difficult)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(travel, was across sahara challenging)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(travel, was across sahara desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(travel, was across sahara)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(travel, was across sahara desert)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(travel, was across sahara desert difficult)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(travel, was across sahara desert difficult)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(travel, was across sahara)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(travel, was across sahara desert difficult)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(travel, was across sahara desert difficult)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(travel, was across sahara desert)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(travel, was across sahara)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(travel, was acrossed sahara difficult)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(travel, was across sahara hard)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(travel, was acrossed sahara difficult)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(travel, was across sahara hard)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(travel, was across sahara hard)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(travel, was across sahara hard)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(travel, was acrossed sahara difficult)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(travel, was acrossed sahara difficult)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(travel, was difficult in times)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(travel, was across sahara desert)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(travel, was difficult in ancient times)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(travel, was difficult in times)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(travel, was difficult in ancient times)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(travel, was difficult in times)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(travel, was difficult in times)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(travel, was across sahara)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(travel, was difficult in ancient times)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(travel, was difficult in ancient times)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(travel, was across sahara challenging)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(travel, was across sahara challenging)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(travel, was across sahara challenging)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(time travel, is difficult)