travel: was difficult in times

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents air travel
Weight: 0.74
, operating expense
Weight: 0.65
, adventure
Weight: 0.62
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, traveler
Weight: 0.59
Siblings time travel
Weight: 0.38
, trip
Weight: 0.36
, ticket
Weight: 0.33
, camping
Weight: 0.32
, snow skiing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was difficult in times 1.00
was difficult in ancient times 0.91
is difficult 0.90
was acrossed sahara difficult 0.83
be thought impossible 0.81
is impossible 0.79
is hard 0.79
be to impossible 0.79
was difficult for greeks 0.78
is time tv-pg 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(adventure, is hard)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(travel, was difficult in times)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(gift, is hard)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(travel, was difficult in times)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(adventure, is time tv-pg)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(travel, was difficult in times)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(adventure, is time tv-pg)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(gift, is hard)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(adventure, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(adventure, is time tv-pg)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(gift, is hard)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(adventure, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(time travel, is impossible)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(time travel, is difficult)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(time travel, be thought impossible)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(time travel, be to impossible)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(adventure, is hard)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(travel, was difficult in times)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(gift, is hard)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(travel, was difficult in times)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(adventure, is time tv-pg)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(travel, was difficult in times)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(time travel, is impossible)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(time travel, is impossible)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(time travel, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(time travel, is difficult)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(time travel, be to impossible)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(time travel, be to impossible)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(time travel, be thought impossible)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(time travel, be thought impossible)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(travel, was difficult in times)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(travel, was acrossed sahara difficult)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(travel, was difficult in ancient times)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(travel, was acrossed sahara difficult)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(travel, was acrossed sahara difficult)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(travel, was difficult in ancient times)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(travel, was acrossed sahara difficult)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(travel, was difficult in ancient times)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(travel, was difficult in ancient times)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(travel, was difficult for greeks)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(travel, was difficult for greeks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(travel, was difficult for greeks)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(travel, was difficult for greeks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(travel, was difficult in times)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(travel, was difficult in times)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(adventure, is time tv-pg)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(gift, is hard)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(adventure, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(time travel, is impossible)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(time travel, be to impossible)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(time travel, be thought impossible)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(time travel, is difficult)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(adventure, is time tv-pg)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(gift, is hard)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(travel, was difficult in times)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(adventure, is hard)