travel: was like like france

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents air travel
Weight: 0.74
, operating expense
Weight: 0.65
, adventure
Weight: 0.62
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, traveler
Weight: 0.59
Siblings time travel
Weight: 0.38
, trip
Weight: 0.36
, ticket
Weight: 0.33
, camping
Weight: 0.32
, snow skiing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was like like france 1.00
was like like france in time 0.98
was like like france in time verne 0.98
was like like france in time of jules verne 0.97
was like like france in time of jules 0.97
is like 0.81
is europe now 0.80
is europe right now 0.79
be in europe 0.79
is europe cheap right now 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(air travel, be in europe)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(travel, was like like france)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(travel, was like like france)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(air travel, be in europe)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(travel, was like like france)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(air travel, be in europe)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(travel, was like like france)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(camping, is like)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(air travel, be in europe)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(travel, was like like france)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(travel, was like like france)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(travel, was like like france)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(camping, is like)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(camping, is like)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(travel, was like like france)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(travel, was like like france)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(travel, was like like france)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(travel, was like like france in time of jules)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(travel, was like like france)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(travel, was like like france)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(travel, was like like france)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(travel, was like like france in time)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(travel, was like like france)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(travel, was like like france in time verne)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(travel, was like like france)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(travel, was like like france in time of jules)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(travel, was like like france)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(travel, was like like france in time of jules)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(travel, was like like france)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(travel, was like like france in time verne)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(travel, was like like france)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(travel, was like like france)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(travel, was like like france in time)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(travel, was like like france)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(travel, was like like france in time verne)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(travel, was like like france)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(travel, was like like france in time)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(travel, was like like france)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(travel, was like like france in time verne)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(travel, was like like france)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(travel, was like like france)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(travel, was like like france in time)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(travel, was like like france)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(travel, was like like france in time of jules)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(travel, was like like france)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(travel, was like like france)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(travel, was like like france)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(travel, was like like france)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(travel, was like like france)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(travel, was like like france)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(air travel, be in europe)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(travel, was like like france)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(camping, is like)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(travel, was like like france)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(air travel, be in europe)