travel: was like like france in time of jules verne

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents air travel
Weight: 0.74
, operating expense
Weight: 0.65
, adventure
Weight: 0.62
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, traveler
Weight: 0.59
Siblings time travel
Weight: 0.38
, trip
Weight: 0.36
, ticket
Weight: 0.33
, camping
Weight: 0.32
, snow skiing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was like like france in time of jules verne 1.00
was like like france in time of jules 1.00
was like like france in time 0.97
was like like france in time verne 0.97
was like like france 0.97
is europe right now 0.81
be for hannah montana expensive 0.80
be damn expensive for sunday 's game 0.80
is europe now 0.80
be for hannah montana 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ticket, be damn expensive for sunday 's game)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ticket, be damn expensive for sunday 's game)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(ticket, be damn expensive for sunday 's game)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(travel, was like like france in time of jules)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(travel, was like like france in time of jules)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(travel, was like like france)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(travel, was like like france in time verne)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(travel, was like like france in time)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(travel, was like like france in time of jules)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(travel, was like like france in time)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(travel, was like like france in time of jules)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(travel, was like like france in time verne)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(travel, was like like france in time verne)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(travel, was like like france in time verne)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(travel, was like like france in time)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(travel, was like like france in time)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(travel, was like like france)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(travel, was like like france)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(travel, was like like france)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(travel, was like like france in time of jules verne)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ticket, be damn expensive for sunday 's game)