travel: was on silk road difficult

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents air travel
Weight: 0.74
, operating expense
Weight: 0.65
, adventure
Weight: 0.62
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, traveler
Weight: 0.59
Siblings time travel
Weight: 0.38
, trip
Weight: 0.36
, ticket
Weight: 0.33
, camping
Weight: 0.32
, snow skiing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was on silk road difficult 1.00
was on silk road 0.96
was acrossed sahara difficult 0.77
was difficult in ancient times 0.77
is difficult 0.77
was difficult in times 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(travel, was on silk road difficult)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(time travel, is difficult)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(travel, was on silk road difficult)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(time travel, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(time travel, is difficult)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(travel, was on silk road difficult)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(travel, was on silk road difficult)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(travel, was on silk road difficult)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(travel, was on silk road)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(travel, was on silk road difficult)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(travel, was on silk road)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(travel, was on silk road difficult)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(travel, was on silk road)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(travel, was on silk road difficult)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(travel, was on silk road)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(travel, was on silk road difficult)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(travel, was acrossed sahara difficult)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(travel, was on silk road difficult)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(travel, was acrossed sahara difficult)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(travel, was on silk road difficult)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(travel, was acrossed sahara difficult)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(travel, was on silk road difficult)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(travel, was difficult in times)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(travel, was on silk road difficult)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(travel, was acrossed sahara difficult)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(travel, was on silk road difficult)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(travel, was difficult in ancient times)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(travel, was on silk road difficult)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(travel, was difficult in times)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(travel, was on silk road difficult)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(travel, was difficult in times)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(travel, was on silk road difficult)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(travel, was difficult in ancient times)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(travel, was on silk road difficult)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(travel, was difficult in ancient times)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(travel, was on silk road difficult)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(travel, was difficult in ancient times)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(travel, was on silk road difficult)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(travel, was difficult in times)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(travel, was on silk road difficult)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(travel, was on silk road difficult)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(travel, was on silk road difficult)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(travel, was on silk road difficult)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(travel, was on silk road difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(travel, was on silk road difficult)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(time travel, is difficult)