trax: be free in downtown slc

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents example
Weight: 0.30
, show
Weight: 0.29
Siblings simpsons
Weight: 0.24
, raw
Weight: 0.24
, talk show
Weight: 0.24
, vision
Weight: 0.24
, instance
Weight: 0.24

Related properties

Property Similarity
be free in downtown slc 1.00
is free downtown slc 1.00
is downtown slc 0.94
is free 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(trax, be free in downtown slc)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(talk show, is free)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(trax, be free in downtown slc)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(talk show, is free)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(talk show, is free)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(trax, be free in downtown slc)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(trax, be free in downtown slc)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(trax, be free in downtown slc)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(trax, is free downtown slc)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(trax, be free in downtown slc)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(trax, is free downtown slc)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(trax, be free in downtown slc)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(trax, is downtown slc)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(trax, be free in downtown slc)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(trax, is free downtown slc)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(trax, be free in downtown slc)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(trax, is downtown slc)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(trax, be free in downtown slc)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(trax, is downtown slc)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(trax, be free in downtown slc)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(trax, is free downtown slc)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(trax, be free in downtown slc)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(trax, is downtown slc)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(trax, be free in downtown slc)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(trax, be free in downtown slc)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(trax, be free in downtown slc)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(trax, be free in downtown slc)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(trax, be free in downtown slc)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(trax, be free in downtown slc)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(talk show, is free)