trax: has quality price

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents example
Weight: 0.30
, show
Weight: 0.29
Siblings simpsons
Weight: 0.24
, raw
Weight: 0.24
, talk show
Weight: 0.24
, vision
Weight: 0.24
, instance
Weight: 0.24

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality price 1.00
has quality cost 0.87
is quality 0.82
is pricing 0.82
has quality good 0.80
has quality better 0.79
has quality bad 0.78
is important quality 0.77
has quality class 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(show, is quality)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(trax, has quality price)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(show, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(show, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(talk show, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(instance, is pricing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(instance, has quality class)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(simpsons, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(simpsons, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(raw, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(show, is quality)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(trax, has quality price)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(raw, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(raw, has quality better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(instance, is pricing)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(instance, is pricing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(simpsons, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(simpsons, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(talk show, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(talk show, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(simpsons, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(simpsons, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(instance, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(instance, has quality class)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(trax, has quality price)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(trax, has quality cost)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(trax, has quality cost)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(trax, has quality cost)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(trax, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(trax, has quality cost)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(trax, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(trax, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(trax, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(trax, has quality price)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(trax, has quality price)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(show, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(raw, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(talk show, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(instance, is pricing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(instance, has quality class)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(simpsons, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(simpsons, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(trax, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(show, is quality)