tree frog: be adapted to rainforests

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.77
, amphibian
Weight: 0.77
, animal
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.66
, frog
Weight: 0.64
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.40
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.39
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38
, monkey
Weight: 0.38
, owl
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be adapted to rainforests 1.00
be adapted live in rainforest 0.93
be important to rainforest 0.86
live in rainforest 0.85
live in tropical rainforest 0.84
be adapted live 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(frog, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(frog, live in rainforest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, live in rainforest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(frog, live in rainforest)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, live in rainforest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be important to rainforest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(frog, live in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(monkey, be important to rainforest)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(monkey, be important to rainforest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tree frog, be adapted live in rainforest)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(tree frog, be adapted live in rainforest)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(tree frog, be adapted live in rainforest)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tree frog, be important to rainforest)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(tree frog, live in tropical rainforest)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tree frog, live in tropical rainforest)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tree frog, live in rainforest)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(tree frog, live in tropical rainforest)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(tree frog, be important to rainforest)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(tree frog, live in rainforest)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tree frog, be important to rainforest)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(tree frog, live in rainforest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, live in tropical rainforest)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tree frog, be adapted live)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(tree frog, be adapted live)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tree frog, be adapted live)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, live in rainforest)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be adapted live in rainforest)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be important to rainforest)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be adapted live)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(frog, live in rainforest)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, live in rainforest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(monkey, be important to rainforest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(frog, live in rainforest)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(tree frog, be adapted to rainforests)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, live in rainforest)