tree frog: defend themselves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.77
, amphibian
Weight: 0.77
, animal
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.66
, frog
Weight: 0.64
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.40
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.39
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38
, monkey
Weight: 0.38
, owl
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
defend themselves 1.00
bury themselves 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(amphibian, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tree frog, defend themselves)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tree frog, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(amphibian, defend themselves)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, defend themselves)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(amphibian, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(tree frog, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(tree frog, defend themselves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tree frog, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(tree frog, defend themselves)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(tree frog, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(tree frog, bury themselves)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(tree frog, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(tree frog, bury themselves)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tree frog, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(tree frog, bury themselves)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(tree frog, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, bury themselves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(tree frog, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tree frog, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, defend themselves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(tree frog, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tree frog, defend themselves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(amphibian, defend themselves)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(tree frog, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(amphibian, defend themselves)