tree frog: get endangered

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.77
, amphibian
Weight: 0.77
, animal
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.66
, frog
Weight: 0.64
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.40
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.39
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38
, monkey
Weight: 0.38
, owl
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
get endangered 1.00
is endangered 0.97
is species 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(amphibian, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tree frog, get endangered)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tree frog, get endangered)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(species, is endangered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(amphibian, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, is endangered)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(lizard, is endangered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monkey, is endangered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dung beetle, is endangered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(owl, is endangered)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(amphibian, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(tree frog, get endangered)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(tree frog, get endangered)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(dung beetle, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(dung beetle, is endangered)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(owl, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(owl, is endangered)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(monkey, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(monkey, is endangered)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(lizard, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(lizard, is endangered)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(tree frog, get endangered)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tree frog, is endangered)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(tree frog, is endangered)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(tree frog, is endangered)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(tree frog, is species)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(tree frog, is species)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(tree frog, is species)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, is endangered)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, is species)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, get endangered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tree frog, get endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(amphibian, is endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(dung beetle, is endangered)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(owl, is endangered)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(lizard, is endangered)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(monkey, is endangered)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(tree frog, get endangered)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(amphibian, is endangered)