tree frog: is endangered

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.77
, amphibian
Weight: 0.77
, animal
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.66
, frog
Weight: 0.64
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.40
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.39
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38
, monkey
Weight: 0.38
, owl
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is endangered 1.00
get endangered 0.97
is species 0.79
is extinct 0.76
is invasive species 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(amphibian, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tree frog, is endangered)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tree frog, is endangered)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(species, is endangered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(amphibian, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, is endangered)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(lizard, is endangered)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(monkey, is extinct)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monkey, is endangered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dung beetle, is endangered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(owl, is endangered)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(amphibian, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(tree frog, is endangered)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(tree frog, is endangered)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(dung beetle, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(dung beetle, is endangered)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(owl, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(owl, is endangered)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(monkey, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(monkey, is endangered)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(lizard, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(lizard, is endangered)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(monkey, is extinct) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(monkey, is extinct)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(tree frog, is endangered)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tree frog, get endangered)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(tree frog, get endangered)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(tree frog, get endangered)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(tree frog, is species)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(tree frog, is species)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(tree frog, is species)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, get endangered)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tree frog, is extinct)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(tree frog, is invasive species)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(tree frog, is extinct)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(tree frog, is invasive species)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(tree frog, is extinct)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(tree frog, is invasive species)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, is extinct)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, is invasive species)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, is species)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, is endangered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tree frog, is endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(amphibian, is endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(dung beetle, is endangered)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(monkey, is extinct)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(owl, is endangered)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(lizard, is endangered)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(monkey, is endangered)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(amphibian, is endangered)