tree frog: viewed in white look green

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.77
, amphibian
Weight: 0.77
, animal
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.66
, frog
Weight: 0.64
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.40
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.39
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38
, monkey
Weight: 0.38
, owl
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
viewed in white look green 1.00
viewed in white light look green 0.98
viewed in look green 0.97
viewed in white look 0.96
viewed in light look green 0.96
viewed in white light look 0.95
viewed in light look 0.91
viewed in look 0.90
has color green 0.82
turn dark green 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(frog, has color green)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(tree frog, viewed in white look green)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(frog, has color green)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(frog, has color green)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lizard, has color green)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(frog, has color green)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(tree frog, viewed in white look green)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(lizard, has color green)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(lizard, has color green)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(tree frog, viewed in white look green)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, viewed in white light look green)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(tree frog, viewed in white light look green)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(tree frog, viewed in white light look green)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, viewed in white light look)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(tree frog, viewed in white light look)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, viewed in white look)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(tree frog, viewed in white light look green)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, viewed in look green)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(tree frog, viewed in look green)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(tree frog, viewed in look green)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(tree frog, viewed in white light look)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(tree frog, viewed in white look)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(tree frog, viewed in white light look)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tree frog, viewed in white look)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(tree frog, viewed in look green)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, viewed in light look green)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, turn dark green)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(tree frog, viewed in white look)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tree frog, viewed in look)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(tree frog, turn dark green)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(tree frog, viewed in light look green)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tree frog, turn dark green)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(tree frog, turn dark green)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has color green)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, viewed in look)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tree frog, viewed in light look)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(tree frog, has color green)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, viewed in light look)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(tree frog, viewed in look)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(tree frog, viewed in light look green)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(tree frog, viewed in light look green)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(tree frog, viewed in look)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(tree frog, has color green)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(tree frog, has color green)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(tree frog, viewed in light look)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(tree frog, viewed in light look)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, viewed in white look green)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(tree frog, viewed in white look green)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(frog, has color green)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(lizard, has color green)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(tree frog, viewed in white look green)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(frog, has color green)