tree: be find in forest

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents christmas tree
Weight: 0.81
, berry
Weight: 0.63
, vegetation
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.60
Siblings cherry tree
Weight: 0.86
, apple tree
Weight: 0.80
, maple tree
Weight: 0.77
, oak tree
Weight: 0.77
, ficus
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be find in forest 1.00
be at in forest 0.96
be at forest 0.96
be a part of forest 0.94
be find in group call forest 0.92
has fall down in forest 0.87
be at tropical forest 0.86
be at rainforest 0.81
be find in wood 0.79
be at tropical rainforest 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(tree, be find in forest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(creature, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical rainforest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at rainforest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, be find in wood)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, be find in wood)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(tree, be find in forest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at tropical forest)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(oak tree, be find in wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(oak tree, be find in wood)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(ficus, be at rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at rainforest)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at tropical rainforest)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(maple tree, be find in wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(maple tree, be find in wood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(tree, be find in forest)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(tree, be find in group call forest)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(tree, be a part of forest)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tree, be at in forest)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in forest)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tree, be find in group call forest)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tree, be a part of forest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tree, be at in forest)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(tree, has fall down in forest)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(tree, be at rainforest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(tree, be find in group call forest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at rainforest)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tree, has fall down in forest)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tree, be a part of forest)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(tree, be at in forest)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(tree, be at rainforest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tree, has fall down in forest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(tree, be a part of forest)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(tree, has fall down in forest)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tree, be find in group call forest)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tree, be at rainforest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tree, be find in forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(tree, be find in forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(maple tree, be find in wood)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ficus, be at tropical forest)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(oak tree, be find in wood)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ficus, be at rainforest)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ficus, be at tropical rainforest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)