tree: be in rainforest

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents christmas tree
Weight: 0.81
, berry
Weight: 0.63
, vegetation
Weight: 0.62
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cherry tree
Weight: 0.86
, apple tree
Weight: 0.80
, chestnut tree
Weight: 0.79
, maple tree
Weight: 0.77
, oak tree
Weight: 0.77

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in rainforest 1.00
be in daintree rainforest 1.00
be in tropical rainforest 0.94
be in rainforests 0.93
adapt to rainforest 0.91
grow well in rainforest 0.91
be tall in rainforest 0.91
flourish in rainforests 0.84
be in forest 0.83
be rare in savanna biome 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(tree, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, grow well in rainforest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tree, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(maple tree, grow well in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(maple tree, grow well in rainforest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tree, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(tree, be in rainforest)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(tree, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tree, be in forest)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tree, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(tree, be in forest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(tree, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(tree, be in forest)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(tree, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(tree, be in forest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(tree, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tree, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(tree, be in rainforest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tree, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tree, be in rainforest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(tree, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(maple tree, grow well in rainforest)