tree: grow in forest

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents christmas tree
Weight: 0.81
, berry
Weight: 0.63
, vegetation
Weight: 0.62
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cherry tree
Weight: 0.86
, apple tree
Weight: 0.80
, chestnut tree
Weight: 0.79
, maple tree
Weight: 0.77
, oak tree
Weight: 0.77

Related properties

Property Similarity
grow in forest 1.00
be in forest grow 1.00
grow in natural forest 0.96
be in forest 0.93
be in forest cut 0.90
help animals in forest 0.88
be in coniferous forest 0.87
grow well in rainforest 0.86
found in forests 0.86
affect soil of forest 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(tree, grow in forest)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, grow well in rainforest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tree, grow in forest)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(maple tree, grow well in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(maple tree, grow well in rainforest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tree, grow in forest)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(tree, grow in forest)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(tree, grow in forest)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(tree, be in forest)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tree, grow in forest)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(tree, be in forest)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(tree, grow in forest)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(tree, help animals in forest)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(tree, grow in forest)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tree, be in forest)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(tree, grow in forest)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(tree, be in forest)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(tree, grow in forest)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(tree, help animals in forest)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tree, grow in forest)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(tree, help animals in forest)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(tree, grow in forest)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(tree, help animals in forest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(tree, grow in forest)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(tree, grow in forest)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(tree, grow in forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tree, grow in forest)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(tree, grow in forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(tree, grow in forest)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(maple tree, grow well in rainforest)