trehalose: is reducing sugar

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sugar
Weight: 0.67
, disaccharide
Weight: 0.51
, product
Weight: 0.42
, ingredient
Weight: 0.40
, art
Weight: 0.35
Siblings fructose
Weight: 0.35
, glycerol
Weight: 0.35
, galactose
Weight: 0.35
, ribose
Weight: 0.35
, lactose
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is reducing sugar 1.00
is non reducing sugar 0.97
is reducing 0.88
is sugar 0.87
is non sugar 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(lactose, is reducing sugar)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(galactose, is reducing sugar)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(fructose, is reducing sugar)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(fructose, is non reducing sugar)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(lactose, is reducing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(galactose, is sugar)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(galactose, is reducing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lactose, is sugar)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fructose, is reducing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fructose, is sugar)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(lactose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(lactose, is reducing sugar)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(galactose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(galactose, is reducing sugar)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(fructose, is non reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(fructose, is non reducing sugar)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(fructose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(fructose, is reducing sugar)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(fructose, is sugar)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fructose, is sugar)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(galactose, is sugar)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(galactose, is sugar)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(lactose, is sugar)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(lactose, is sugar)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(fructose, is reducing)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(fructose, is reducing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(lactose, is reducing)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(lactose, is reducing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(galactose, is reducing)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(galactose, is reducing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(trehalose, is reducing sugar)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(trehalose, is reducing)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(trehalose, is non reducing sugar)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(trehalose, is sugar)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(trehalose, is non reducing sugar)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(trehalose, is non reducing sugar)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(trehalose, is sugar)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(trehalose, is non sugar)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(trehalose, is sugar)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(trehalose, is non sugar)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(trehalose, is non reducing sugar)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(trehalose, is reducing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(trehalose, is sugar)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(trehalose, is non sugar)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(trehalose, is reducing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(trehalose, is non sugar)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(trehalose, is reducing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(trehalose, is reducing sugar)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(trehalose, is reducing sugar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(lactose, is reducing sugar)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fructose, is non reducing sugar)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(galactose, is reducing sugar)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(fructose, is sugar)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(galactose, is sugar)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(fructose, is reducing sugar)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(lactose, is sugar)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fructose, is reducing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lactose, is reducing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(trehalose, is reducing sugar)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(galactose, is reducing)