trench: were needed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.55
, depression
Weight: 0.54
, line
Weight: 0.54
, obstacle
Weight: 0.53
Siblings furrow
Weight: 0.35
, red line
Weight: 0.32
, boulder
Weight: 0.32
, blue line
Weight: 0.31
, ridge
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
were needed 1.00
were used for ww1 0.86
were used in ww1 0.85
were constucted 0.83
need wanted 0.82
were on kerbs 0.81
were made 0.79
were difficult 0.78
is wanted 0.77
be used for time 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(feature, need wanted)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(trench, were needed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(feature, is wanted)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(trench, were needed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(feature, need wanted)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(feature, is wanted)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(feature, need wanted)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(feature, is wanted)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(feature, need wanted)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(trench, were needed)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(feature, is wanted)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(trench, were needed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(trench, were needed)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(trench, were used for ww1)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(trench, were used in ww1)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(trench, were used for ww1)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(trench, were used in ww1)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(trench, were constucted)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(trench, were used for ww1)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(trench, were used in ww1)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(trench, were used for ww1)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(trench, were used in ww1)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(trench, were constucted)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(trench, were constucted)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(trench, were constucted)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(trench, were made)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(trench, were difficult)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(trench, were made)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(trench, were made)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(trench, were difficult)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(trench, were made)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(trench, were difficult)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(trench, were difficult)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(trench, were needed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(trench, were needed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(feature, need wanted)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(feature, is wanted)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(feature, need wanted)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(trench, were needed)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(feature, is wanted)