trench: were protected

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.55
, depression
Weight: 0.54
, line
Weight: 0.54
, obstacle
Weight: 0.53
Siblings furrow
Weight: 0.35
, red line
Weight: 0.32
, boulder
Weight: 0.32
, blue line
Weight: 0.31
, ridge
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
were protected 1.00
were protected in ww1 1.00
were protected against artillery 0.77
were used in ww1 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(trench, were protected)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(trench, were protected)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(trench, were protected)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(trench, were protected in ww1)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(trench, were protected)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(trench, were protected in ww1)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(trench, were protected)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(trench, were protected in ww1)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(trench, were protected)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(trench, were used in ww1)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(trench, were protected)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(trench, were protected against artillery)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(trench, were protected)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(trench, were protected in ww1)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(trench, were protected)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(trench, were used in ww1)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(trench, were protected)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(trench, were used in ww1)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(trench, were protected)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(trench, were protected against artillery)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(trench, were protected)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(trench, were protected against artillery)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(trench, were protected)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(trench, were protected against artillery)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(trench, were protected)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(trench, were used in ww1)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(trench, were protected)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(trench, were protected)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(trench, were protected)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(trench, were protected)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(trench, were protected)