trend: affect power

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, policy
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.59
, strategy
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
Siblings cloud
Weight: 0.60
, convergence
Weight: 0.60
, denim
Weight: 0.57
, pattern
Weight: 0.35
, decline
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect power 1.00
affect presidential power 0.83
affect health 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(factor, affect health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(trend, affect power)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(trend, affect power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(factor, affect health)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(trend, affect power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(factor, affect health)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(factor, affect health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(trend, affect power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(trend, affect power)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(trend, affect power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(trend, affect power)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(trend, affect power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(trend, affect presidential power)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(trend, affect power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(trend, affect presidential power)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(trend, affect power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(trend, affect presidential power)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(trend, affect power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(trend, affect health)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(trend, affect power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(trend, affect presidential power)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(trend, affect power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(trend, affect health)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(trend, affect power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(trend, affect health)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(trend, affect power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(trend, affect health)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(trend, affect power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(trend, affect power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(trend, affect power)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(trend, affect power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(trend, affect power)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(trend, affect power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(factor, affect health)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(trend, affect power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(factor, affect health)