trend: analysis of is financial ratios

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, policy
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.59
, strategy
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
Siblings cloud
Weight: 0.60
, convergence
Weight: 0.60
, denim
Weight: 0.57
, pattern
Weight: 0.35
, decline
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
analysis of is financial ratios 1.00
analysis of is financial ratios important 0.99
analysis of is ratios 0.97
analysis of is ratios important 0.96
is analysis 0.83
analysis 0.83
be more important in financial statements 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(item, analysis)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(factor, analysis)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(policy, analysis)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(policy, analysis)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(factor, analysis)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(item, analysis)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, analysis)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(factor, analysis)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(policy, analysis)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(item, analysis)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(factor, analysis)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(policy, analysis)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(trend, analysis of is ratios)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(trend, analysis of is ratios)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(trend, analysis of is financial ratios important)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(trend, analysis of is ratios)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(trend, analysis of is ratios important)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(trend, analysis of is financial ratios important)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(trend, analysis of is ratios important)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(trend, analysis of is financial ratios important)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(trend, is analysis)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(trend, analysis of is ratios important)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(trend, analysis)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(trend, is analysis)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(trend, analysis)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(trend, is analysis)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(trend, analysis)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis of is financial ratios important)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis of is ratios important)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(trend, be more important in financial statements)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis of is ratios)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(trend, be more important in financial statements)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(trend, be more important in financial statements)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(trend, be more important in financial statements)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(trend, is analysis)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(policy, analysis)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(factor, analysis)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(item, analysis)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(policy, analysis)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(factor, analysis)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(item, analysis)