trend: analysis of is ratios important

Related concepts

Parents	factor Weight: 0.64 , policy Weight: 0.60 , topic Weight: 0.59 , strategy Weight: 0.58 , item Weight: 0.58
Siblings	cloud Weight: 0.60 , convergence Weight: 0.60 , denim Weight: 0.57 , pattern Weight: 0.35 , decline Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
analysis of is ratios important	1.00
analysis of is ratios	0.99
analysis of is financial ratios important	0.97
analysis of is financial ratios	0.96
is analysis	0.85
analysis	0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(item, analysis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(trend, analysis of is ratios important)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(factor, analysis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(trend, analysis of is ratios important)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(policy, analysis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(trend, analysis of is ratios important)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(policy, analysis)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(factor, analysis)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(item, analysis)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(item, analysis)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(factor, analysis)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(policy, analysis)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(item, analysis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(trend, analysis of is ratios important)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(factor, analysis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(trend, analysis of is ratios important)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(policy, analysis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(trend, analysis of is ratios important)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(trend, analysis of is ratios important)

Similarity expansion

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(trend, analysis of is ratios)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(trend, analysis of is ratios)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(trend, analysis of is financial ratios important)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(trend, analysis of is ratios)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(trend, is analysis)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(trend, analysis)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis of is financial ratios important)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis of is ratios)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(trend, is analysis)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(trend, is analysis)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(trend, analysis)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(trend, analysis)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(trend, analysis of is financial ratios important)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(trend, analysis of is financial ratios)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(trend, analysis of is financial ratios important)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(trend, is analysis)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis of is ratios important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(trend, analysis of is ratios important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(policy, analysis)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(factor, analysis)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(item, analysis)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(policy, analysis)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(factor, analysis)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(trend, analysis of is ratios important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(item, analysis)