triangulation: be necessary in research

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.64
, strategy
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, algorithm
Weight: 0.54
, technology
Weight: 0.54
Siblings intuition
Weight: 0.32
, waterboarding
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.32
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.31
, point system
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be necessary in research 1.00
be important in research 0.93
be used in research 0.92
be important in qualitative research 0.86
be used in qualitative research 0.86
be beneficial in method study 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(method, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(triangulation, be necessary in research)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(method, be important in research)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(method, be important in research)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(method, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(triangulation, be necessary in research)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(triangulation, be necessary in research)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(triangulation, be used in research)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(triangulation, be used in research)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(triangulation, be important in research)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(triangulation, be important in research)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(triangulation, be used in research)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(triangulation, be important in research)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(triangulation, be used in qualitative research)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(triangulation, be used in qualitative research)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(triangulation, be important in qualitative research)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(triangulation, be important in qualitative research)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(triangulation, be used in qualitative research)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(triangulation, be important in qualitative research)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(triangulation, be used in research)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(triangulation, be beneficial in method study)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(triangulation, be used in qualitative research)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(triangulation, be beneficial in method study)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(triangulation, be important in research)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(triangulation, be beneficial in method study)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(triangulation, be important in qualitative research)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(triangulation, be beneficial in method study)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(triangulation, be necessary in research)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(triangulation, be necessary in research)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(method, be important in research)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(triangulation, be necessary in research)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(method, be important in research)