trimester: has quality loss

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents option
Weight: 0.35
, term
Weight: 0.34
, period
Weight: 0.32
, time
Weight: 0.30
, woman
Weight: 0.29
Siblings hysterectomy
Weight: 0.27
, pregnant woman
Weight: 0.27
, stock option
Weight: 0.26
, fiscal year
Weight: 0.26
, method
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality loss 1.00
has quality bad 0.79
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(trimester, has quality loss)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(stock option, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(stock option, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fiscal year, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(trimester, has quality loss)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(fiscal year, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fiscal year, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(hysterectomy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hysterectomy, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(stock option, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(stock option, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(stock option, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(stock option, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(trimester, has quality loss)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(trimester, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(trimester, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(trimester, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(trimester, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(trimester, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(trimester, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(trimester, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(trimester, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(trimester, has quality loss)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(trimester, has quality loss)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(fiscal year, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(stock option, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(stock option, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(trimester, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)