trout: have scales

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.72
, fish
Weight: 0.71
, player
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings rainbow trout
Weight: 0.79

Related properties

Property Similarity
have scales 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fish, have scales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(trout, have scales)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(trout, have scales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(fish, have scales)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(trout, have scales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(fish, have scales)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(trout, have scales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(rainbow trout, have scales)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fish, have scales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(trout, have scales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(trout, have scales)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(trout, have scales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(rainbow trout, have scales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(rainbow trout, have scales)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(trout, have scales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(trout, have scales)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(trout, have scales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(trout, have scales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(trout, have scales)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(trout, have scales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(trout, have scales)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(trout, have scales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(fish, have scales)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(trout, have scales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(rainbow trout, have scales)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(trout, have scales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(fish, have scales)