truck: have extra wheels

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dump truck
Weight: 0.82
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.69
, vehicle
Weight: 0.68
, internal combustion engine
Weight: 0.62
Siblings pickup truck
Weight: 0.86
, semi truck
Weight: 0.71
, police car
Weight: 0.69
, oil tanker
Weight: 0.68
, chevrolet
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
have extra wheels 1.00
have extra set of wheels 0.96
have extra wide wheels 0.94
have extra rear wheels 0.94
have extra wide rear wheels 0.91
have 18 wheels 0.90
have wheels 0.90
have many wheels 0.88
have small wheels 0.87
have wheels on top 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(dump truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(truck, have extra wheels)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(dump truck, have extra set of wheels)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(truck, have extra wheels)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(dump truck, have wheels)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(truck, have extra wheels)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(dump truck, have wheels)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(dump truck, have extra wheels)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(dump truck, have extra set of wheels)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(dump truck, have extra set of wheels)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(dump truck, have extra wheels)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(dump truck, have wheels)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(semi truck, have 18 wheels)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(dump truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(truck, have extra wheels)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(dump truck, have extra set of wheels)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(truck, have extra wheels)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(dump truck, have wheels)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(truck, have extra wheels)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(semi truck, have 18 wheels)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(semi truck, have 18 wheels)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(truck, have extra wheels)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(truck, have wheels)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(truck, have wheels)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(truck, have wheels)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(truck, have wheels on top)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(truck, have extra wide rear wheels)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(truck, have wheels on top)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(truck, have wheels on top)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(truck, have extra wide rear wheels)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(truck, have extra wide rear wheels)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(truck, have extra wide rear wheels)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(truck, have wheels on top)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(truck, have wheels)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(truck, have extra wheels)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(truck, have extra wheels)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(dump truck, have wheels)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(dump truck, have extra wheels)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(dump truck, have extra set of wheels)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(semi truck, have 18 wheels)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(dump truck, have extra wheels)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(dump truck, have wheels)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(truck, have extra wheels)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(dump truck, have extra set of wheels)