truffle: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.60
, dessert
Weight: 0.58
, candy
Weight: 0.56
, dish
Weight: 0.55
, chocolate
Weight: 0.54
Siblings tiramisu
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.35
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.35
, ravioli
Weight: 0.35
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
taste good 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(truffle, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(candy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(truffle, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(truffle, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(dessert, taste good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(truffle, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(candy, taste good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(truffle, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(dessert, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(candy, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chocolate, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(candy, taste good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(candy, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(candy, taste good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chocolate cake, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(truffle, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(candy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(truffle, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(truffle, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(dessert, taste good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(truffle, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(candy, taste good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(truffle, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chocolate cake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(chocolate cake, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(fruit salad, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(truffle, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(truffle, taste good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(truffle, taste good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(truffle, taste good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(truffle, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(truffle, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(truffle, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(candy, taste good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dessert, taste good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(candy, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chocolate, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(chocolate cake, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fruit salad, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tiramisu, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(candy, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chocolate, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(candy, taste good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(truffle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dessert, taste good)