trunk: be used to storage of food utensil

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents car
Weight: 0.62
, door
Weight: 0.60
, branch
Weight: 0.58
, material
Weight: 0.56
Siblings police car
Weight: 0.35
, front door
Weight: 0.35
, pickup truck
Weight: 0.34
, car wash
Weight: 0.34
, driveway
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to storage of food utensil 1.00
be used to storage 0.80
be at lock in storage cabinet 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(door, be at lock in storage cabinet)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(trunk, be used to storage of food utensil)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(trunk, be used to storage of food utensil)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(door, be at lock in storage cabinet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(trunk, be used to storage of food utensil)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(door, be at lock in storage cabinet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(door, be at lock in storage cabinet)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(trunk, be used to storage of food utensil)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(trunk, be used to storage of food utensil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(trunk, be used to storage of food utensil)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(trunk, be used to storage of food utensil)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(trunk, be used to storage of food utensil)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(trunk, be used to storage)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(trunk, be used to storage of food utensil)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(trunk, be used to storage)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(trunk, be used to storage of food utensil)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(trunk, be used to storage)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(trunk, be used to storage of food utensil)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(trunk, be used to storage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(trunk, be used to storage of food utensil)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(trunk, be used to storage of food utensil)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(trunk, be used to storage of food utensil)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(trunk, be used to storage of food utensil)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(trunk, be used to storage of food utensil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(trunk, be used to storage of food utensil)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(door, be at lock in storage cabinet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(trunk, be used to storage of food utensil)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(door, be at lock in storage cabinet)