trust: is good value

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.68
, real estate
Weight: 0.66
, work
Weight: 0.63
, document
Weight: 0.62
Siblings faith
Weight: 0.35
, integrity
Weight: 0.34
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.34
, loyalty
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good value 1.00
is value 0.95
is important value 0.95
has quality good 0.81
has quality bad 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(work, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(trust, is good value)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(real estate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(trust, is good value)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(real estate, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(work, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(real estate, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(work, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(faith, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(faith, is important value)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(integrity, is good value)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(faith, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(faith, is value)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(integrity, is important value)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, is value)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(integrity, is value)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, is important value)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(integrity, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(work, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(trust, is good value)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(real estate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(trust, is good value)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(integrity, is good value)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(integrity, is good value)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(integrity, is value)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(integrity, is value)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(loyalty, is value)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(loyalty, is value)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(loyalty, is important value)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(loyalty, is important value)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(faith, is value)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(faith, is value)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(integrity, is important value)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(integrity, is important value)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(faith, is important value)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(faith, is important value)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(integrity, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(integrity, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(loyalty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(loyalty, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(loyalty, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(loyalty, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(faith, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(faith, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(faith, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(faith, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(trust, is good value)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(trust, is important value)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(trust, is important value)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(trust, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(trust, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(trust, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(trust, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(trust, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(trust, is important value)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(trust, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(trust, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(trust, is important value)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(trust, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(trust, is good value)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(real estate, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(work, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(loyalty, is value)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(integrity, is value)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(integrity, is good value)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(loyalty, is important value)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(integrity, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(loyalty, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(loyalty, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(integrity, is important value)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(faith, is value)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(faith, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(faith, is important value)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(faith, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(real estate, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(trust, is good value)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(work, has quality good)