truth: be essential to logic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.67
, lie
Weight: 0.65
, theme
Weight: 0.63
, principle
Weight: 0.62
Siblings gospel
Weight: 0.64
, salvation
Weight: 0.63
, mankind
Weight: 0.53
, samsara
Weight: 0.46
, reality
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be essential to logic 1.00
is logic important 0.96
is logic 0.93
is functional logic important 0.91
is functional logic 0.89
be necessary as concept 0.78
is important philosophy 0.77
is fundamentally paradoxical 0.76
is necessary 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(concept, is fundamentally paradoxical)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(truth, be essential to logic)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(concept, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(truth, be essential to logic)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(concept, is necessary)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(concept, is fundamentally paradoxical)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(concept, is fundamentally paradoxical)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(concept, is necessary)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(concept, is fundamentally paradoxical)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(truth, be essential to logic)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(concept, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(truth, be essential to logic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(truth, be essential to logic)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(truth, is functional logic)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(truth, is logic important)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(truth, be necessary as concept)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(truth, is logic)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(truth, is functional logic)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(truth, is functional logic)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(truth, is functional logic important)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(truth, is logic)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(truth, is logic)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(truth, is logic)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(truth, is functional logic)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(truth, is functional logic important)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(truth, is functional logic important)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(truth, be necessary as concept)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(truth, is functional logic important)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(truth, is logic important)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(truth, is logic important)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(truth, is important philosophy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(truth, is logic important)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(truth, be necessary as concept)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(truth, be necessary as concept)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(truth, is important philosophy)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(truth, is important philosophy)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(truth, is important philosophy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(truth, be essential to logic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(truth, be essential to logic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(concept, is necessary)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(concept, is fundamentally paradoxical)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(concept, is necessary)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(truth, be essential to logic)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(concept, is fundamentally paradoxical)