tube: be better than transistors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surface
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.60
, conduit
Weight: 0.60
, video
Weight: 0.56
, word
Weight: 0.56
Siblings mucous membrane
Weight: 0.34
, tub
Weight: 0.33
, duct tape
Weight: 0.33
, substrate
Weight: 0.33
, valve
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than transistors 1.00
sound different than transistors 0.97
opposed to modern semiconductors 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(tube, be better than transistors)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(tube, be better than transistors)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(tube, be better than transistors)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tube, sound different than transistors)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(tube, be better than transistors)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(tube, sound different than transistors)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(tube, be better than transistors)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(tube, sound different than transistors)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(tube, be better than transistors)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(tube, opposed to modern semiconductors)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(tube, be better than transistors)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(tube, sound different than transistors)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(tube, be better than transistors)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(tube, opposed to modern semiconductors)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(tube, be better than transistors)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(tube, opposed to modern semiconductors)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(tube, be better than transistors)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(tube, opposed to modern semiconductors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(tube, be better than transistors)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(tube, be better than transistors)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(tube, be better than transistors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(tube, be better than transistors)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(tube, be better than transistors)