tuck: is good book

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents maneuver
Weight: 0.42
, player
Weight: 0.40
, lace
Weight: 0.39
, pattern
Weight: 0.39
, character
Weight: 0.39
Siblings turn
Weight: 0.29
, herringbone
Weight: 0.28
, roll
Weight: 0.28
, nick
Weight: 0.28
, dive
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good book 1.00
is book 0.95
is everlasting good book 0.84
is everlasting book 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tuck, is good book) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(tuck, is good book)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tuck, is good book) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(tuck, is book)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(tuck, is good book) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(tuck, is book)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tuck, is good book) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(tuck, is book)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(tuck, is good book) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(tuck, is book)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tuck, is good book) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(tuck, is everlasting book)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(tuck, is good book) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(tuck, is everlasting good book)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(tuck, is good book) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(tuck, is everlasting book)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(tuck, is good book) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(tuck, is everlasting book)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(tuck, is good book) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(tuck, is everlasting good book)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tuck, is good book) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(tuck, is everlasting good book)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tuck, is good book) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(tuck, is everlasting good book)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tuck, is good book) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(tuck, is everlasting book)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(tuck, is good book) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tuck, is good book) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(tuck, is good book)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tuck, is good book) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tuck, is good book)