tuition: improve quality of education

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.64
, fee
Weight: 0.62
, college student
Weight: 0.62
, charge
Weight: 0.60
, need
Weight: 0.58
Siblings graduate student
Weight: 0.36
, income tax
Weight: 0.34
, undergraduate
Weight: 0.34
, high school
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
improve quality of education 1.00
improve quality 0.93
has quality good 0.81
has quality bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tuition, improve quality of education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(high school, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tuition, improve quality of education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tuition, improve quality of education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(tuition, improve quality of education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(tuition, improve quality of education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(tuition, improve quality of education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(high school, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(high school, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(tuition, improve quality of education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(tuition, improve quality of education)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(tuition, improve quality of education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(tuition, improve quality)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tuition, improve quality of education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tuition, improve quality)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tuition, improve quality of education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tuition, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(tuition, improve quality of education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(tuition, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(tuition, improve quality of education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(tuition, improve quality)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(tuition, improve quality of education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(tuition, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(tuition, improve quality of education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(tuition, improve quality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tuition, improve quality of education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tuition, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(tuition, improve quality of education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(tuition, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(tuition, improve quality of education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tuition, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(tuition, improve quality of education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tuition, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(tuition, improve quality of education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tuition, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(tuition, improve quality of education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tuition, improve quality of education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tuition, improve quality of education)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(tuition, improve quality of education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tuition, improve quality of education)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tuition, improve quality of education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tuition, improve quality of education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tuition, improve quality of education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(high school, has quality bad)